The more I read and learned about the Standing Rock resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline, the more obvious it became that this story must make its way into my curriculum. Here was a fascinating and important story — a story that literally cannot be told without recognizing Native peoples as full participants in their own, and U.S., history.
I put out a call to other teachers, educators, and activists who might be interested in collaborating on some curriculum. I wanted to roll out the lessons in the days before or after Thanksgiving. This timing, I believed, would be a powerful symbolic rejection of the lies about Indian people promulgated in our national Thanksgiving myths, in favor of a real story, about real Indians, leading a powerful movement in the 21st century. Joined in the work by my fellow Lake Oswego High School teacher, Andrew Duden, and Rethinking Schools curriculum editor Bill Bigelow, we quickly agreed that the story lent itself well to a role play and got to work.
Before launching the role play, we wanted to give students a visceral and visual sense of the resistance under way along the Missouri River. We thought immediately of Amy Goodman’s wonderful coverage on Democracy Now!, and specifically, of the horrifying footage of the use of dogs against protestors/Water Protectors by a private security firm (Democracy Now!, 2016). We also used “The Standing Rock Protests by the Numbers,” a short documentary posted at the Los Angeles Times (Etehad and Tchekmedyian, 2016). We asked students to jot down questions that emerged as they watched. Afterward, students shared out their questions and it didn’t take long for them to recognize and frame many of the fundamental issues at stake. Gavin asked, “Are the protestors more angry about the possibility of oil spills or that they’re building on burial grounds?” Kisa asked, “What guarantee does the pipeline company have against the breaking or leaking of the pipe?” Tatum wrote, “Is this pipeline really needed? What is it for? Can they move it somewhere else?” Vivian asked, “Who owns the land the pipeline is being built through?” Finally, Callie wondered, “Does the government care about what could happen to the water of these tribes?” These questions not only built toward the role play to come, but also generated possible research questions for the entire unit.
The Role Play
We liked the idea of a role play for a couple reasons. Our first and most important goal was to create a context for students to confront the complex social reality of the Dakota Access Pipeline and the resistance movement to which it has given rise. That social reality includes the history and contemporary status of Indigenous rights, the power of the fossil fuel industry, the support for pipeline infrastructure from segments of organized labor, and the extent to which our government is protecting — or failing to protect — the land, water, and air. The role play asks students to explore these complicated dynamics as active participants. Reading about historical figures is like standing on the sidewalk looking at a house: You can recognize its basic shape, color, and perhaps how many levels it has. Actually assuming the identity of these historical figures allows you to step through the front door and explore what’s inside: How many rooms does it have? What’s the function of each? How are they connected? Which is the most spacious and light? Which the darkest and most cramped? Is it well-built or flimsy? We hoped this role play would enable students to navigate the #noDAPL movement from inside the house, rather than as a bystander peering in from outside. Another of our considerations was that at the moment we were writing, there was little mainstream media attention directed toward Standing Rock, so in some way, the role play was aspirational — a way of insisting that this is a Big Deal, even if that is not reflected in the media. Our aim was for students to know what was happening, but also, perhaps what was not happening, and to begin to wonder about why.
The setting of the role play is a meeting, called by the president, to hear input on whether the Dakota Access Pipeline should be completed. Students, representing five different groups, must convince him that the project should be abandoned or allowed to proceed. Two of the groups are in direct conflict:
- Members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, protesting the pipeline and encamped along the Missouri River in North Dakota
- Energy Transfer Partners, the oil company building the pipeline
The other three groups we selected provide additional context on the question of whether the pipeline should be built:
- Iowa farmers who have brought lawsuits and protested another section of the same pipeline
- Our Children’s Trust, youth activists suing the federal government over its insufficient responses to and action on climate change
- North America’s Building Trades Unions, which represent the workers who consider themselves direct beneficiaries from the pipeline’s construction
After sorting students into five table groups, we distributed the role sheets, which outline each group’s beliefs and interests. We asked students to read and underline important information in their roles. Next we had students answer three questions:
- Do you support the building of the Dakota Access Pipeline? Why or why not?
- What are the three most compelling arguments or pieces of information that you want the president to consider when making his decision to proceed with or halt the construction of the pipeline?
- How do you think the president should respond to the Standing Rock Sioux protesters (and other protesters) currently blocking the way of the pipeline’s construction?
Classroom Stories
I recommend Standing with Standing Rock: A Role Play on the Dakota Access Pipeline, whether it be for teaching current issues Native communities face and/or building empathy and the importance of considering multiple perspectives.
While I don’t love many role playing lessons I’ve witnessed, I found this one to be effective and created with thoughtfulness. As a Native educator, I found that not only did this lesson seem valuable for a group of students, but I actually took away a lot for myself. As someone who views pipelines as very real threats to my communities and wholeheartedly supports pipeline opposition efforts, it was powerful for me to try on the perspective of a pipeline worker for this activity. I still strongly oppose pipelines, but this lesson forced me to humanize another side of this complex issue, to see the workers as people with not vastly different needs than mine and my family’s.
I will say that if you have Native students in your class, please be mindful of how this experience could be triggering for them, particularly with one of the media sources used in the beginning of the lesson of DAPL workers setting dogs on the water protectors. I found this to be emotional and hard to watch in the presence of others.
I used the Standing with Standing Rock: A Role Play on the Dakota Access Pipeline lesson with my sixth grade class.
The students were extremely engaged and excited to prepare their presentation for “the president” (our school security guard, a former debate champ, served in this role) and to form alliances with other stakeholders. They really did a lot of thinking, talking, and review of primary sources. We live near a pipeline that is still being contested, so they were really invested in the topic.
After the lesson, I got the following email from a parent:
[my student] was telling me all about the project and was really enjoying working on it. We had a great conversation about advocacy and how all big things like this are never easy decisions. Thank you so much for guiding them on such valuable topics and helping them think critically about current events.
Finding lessons that examine modern issues facing Indigenous peoples is often challenging, so I was happy to find Standing with Standing Rock: A Role Play on the Dakota Access Pipeline.
It is important to me that the resources I share with students accurately represent a multiplicity of perspectives. Standing with Standing Rock represents balanced perspectives, allowing students to really grapple with the complexity of this significant historical event. Since this is such a recent event, this resource helps my students contextualize history.
A few of my Indigenous students were aware of the protests at Standing Rock or had family who had participated. They were able to see themselves in this history. I was able to leverage their interest to expand their learning.
Maplewood, New Jersey Middle School Teacher
For several years now, the Arizona Indian Education Association holds a Youth Protecting Our Land Summer Camp for Native American youth. The youth camps focus on leadership, advocacy, and environmental stewardship for the Native youth that encourage future leaders of the next generation.
At one of the camps, the planning committee wanted to highlight the NODAPL movement, as it pertains to protection of the tribal lands for the Standing Rock Sioux, and used the Standing with Standing Rock: A Role Play on the Dakota Access Pipeline lesson to help prepare students for a final project — a moving NODAPL legal play.
The first few days were spent with students reviewing the testimonials from tribal leaders, cultural leaders, tribal members, medical first responders, pipeline workers, law enforcement, etc. Students were able to immerse themselves in the roles as they read each one. The end project was an emotionally moving legal play, directed and played out solely by the youth. It was a summer that left a lasting impression of how one voice can make a big difference.
In teaching my Grade 12 Law class, there is a large component that deals with international law in two different senses — the first is how nations interact with one another, and the second is how laws are applied in other countries compared to similar laws here in Canada. I have used the Standing with Standing Rock: A Role Play on the Dakota Access Pipeline lesson for several years now in my classes and have always had great success with my students in helping them to understand the issues that are involved.
Part of our curriculum is helping students better understand the idea of “legal perspectives” — how events and laws are both influenced by and impact various groups in a community. This mixer helps students understand the views and influences the various groups have with respect to the DAPL and opens their eyes to different groups that they may not otherwise consider.
This is also an important resource in my class because I use it in conjunction with our look at the TPX pipeline project here in Canada and how Indigenous groups are impacted because of pipelines, how they respond to threats against their land, and how the legal/political system treats these groups. We also bring in the text This Place: 150 Years Retold, which is a telling of Canadian history from an Indigenous perspective; the chapter “Like a Razor Slash” mirrors much of what is told in the Standing Rock mixer, so this helps students to understand that the issues and concerns do not exist in a silo or vacuum but apply to many different groups. It also shows that there are groups of people all around the world who try to exploit Indigenous peoples and their resources and that this is not just a local issue.
I have loved using this resource and will continue to use it to help my students really understand the nature of these problems and to expose them to the various perspectives that exist within this complex issue.
Video Clip:
FULL Exclusive Report: Dakota Access Pipeline Co. Attacks Native Americans with Dogs & Pepper Spray | Democracy Now!
Related Video
“Stand With Standing Rock” by David Rovics
Excellent. Need more teachers to teach our children how relevant education is and how applies to their life. This is great!